EPA v. DEXTER CORP 2
Final Order With Penalty
Penalty assessed
$13,000,000
Case summary
THIS CASE ARISES FROM THE VIOLATIONS OF THE DEXTER CORPORATION OF SECTION 301 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT. DEXTER WAS ISSUED ON NPDES PERMIT BY THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT ON NOVEBER 22, 1989. THE PERMIT ESTABLISHED REPORTING AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS, AS WELL AS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR THREE DISCHARGES AND ONE INTAKE POINT. DEXTER HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE REPORTING AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR SEVERAL MONTHS AND HAS ROUTINELY EXCEEDED THE EFFLUENT LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMIT. THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED FOR THE COGENERATION PLANT OPERATED BY DEXTER, ADJACENT TO ITS CANAL BANK ROAD PAPER MILL.
Defendants (1)
- DEXTER CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
DEXTER CORPORATION SPECIALTY PROCESSING DIVISION
3 CHIRNSIDE ROAD, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT, 06096
Registry ID: 110001735481
Statutes cited
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
DEXTER CORPentered 1992-11-13
Primary law: CWA
Federal penalty: $9,000,000
Timeline (7 milestones)
- 1989-12-20Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1990-06-30Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1992-09-03Complaint Filed With Court
- 1992-11-13Final Order Lodged
- 1992-11-13Final Order Entered
- 1992-11-13Concluded
- 1996-08-26Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 214
- Case number
- 01-1990-0045
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- Branch
- WAT
- EPA region
- 01
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-1990-0045 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.