Article 2, Section 2, Clause 1 — Executive Departments
Primary source
Commentary below is sourced from the Cornell Legal Information Institute (LII) mirror of the U.S. Constitution Annotated, used per LII's robots.txt with 10-second crawl-delay compliance.
Commentary
prev | next
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 authorizes the President to require the department heads of the Executive Branch to advise the President in writing on matters relating to their duties. The Framers adopted this provision when proposals to establish a Council of State to advise the President failed to win the necessary support at the Constitutional Convention.[1](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-1/executive-departments#fn1art2 " 1 Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, at 70, 97, 110 (Max Farrand ed., 1911)[hereinafter Farrand’s Records; 2 Farrand’s Records at 285, 328, 335–37, 367, 537–42. Debate on the issue in the Convention is discussed in Charles Thach, The Creation of the Presidency 1775–1789 105–110, 116 (1923). ")
In the Federalist No. 74, Alexander Hamilton credited Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 with little importance, stating that he considered the provision to be a “mere redundancy” because “the right for which it provides would result of itself from the office.” [2](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-1/executive-departments#fn2art2 " The Federalist No. 74 (Alexander Hamilton). ")
Discussing the provision in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, Justice Joseph Story opined that while the President’s right to require such opinion “would result from the very nature of the office,” the provision serves a purpose by “impos[ing] a more strict responsibility, and recognizes a public duty of high importance and value in critical times.” [3](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-1/executive-departments#fn3art2 " 3 Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States § 1487 (1837). ")
President George Washington established the practice of the Executive Branch department heads meeting collectively to advise the President as a Cabinet.[4](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-1/executive-departments#fn4art2 " Leonard White, The Federalists: A Study in Administrative History ch. 4 (1948). ")
Consequently, Cabinet meetings are not required under the Constitution.[5](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-1/executive-departments#fn5art2 " Edward S. Corwin, Presidential Power and the Constitution 89 (Richard Loss, ed., 1976) ")
Footnotes
1
1 Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, at 70, 97, 110 (Max Farrand ed., 1911)[hereinafter Farrand’s Records; 2 Farrand’s Records at 285, 328, 335–37, 367, 537–42. Debate on the issue in the Convention is discussed in Charles Thach, The Creation of the Presidency 1775–1789 105–110, 116 (1923).
2
The Federalist No. 74 (Alexander Hamilton).
3
3 Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States § 1487 (1837).
4
Leonard White, The Federalists: A Study in Administrative History ch. 4 (1948).
5
Edward S. Corwin, Presidential Power and the Constitution 89 (Richard Loss, ed., 1976)
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.