Amendment 7 — Appeals From State Courts To The Supreme Court
Primary source
Commentary below is sourced from the Cornell Legal Information Institute (LII) mirror of the U.S. Constitution Annotated, used per LII's robots.txt with 10-second crawl-delay compliance.
Commentary
prev | next
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
The Seventh Amendment clause prohibiting re-examination of any fact found by a jury is not restricted in its application to suits at common law tried before juries in federal courts. It applies equally to cases tried before a jury in a state court and brought to the Supreme Court on appeal.[1](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-7/appeals-from-state-courts-to-the-supreme-court#fn1amd7 " The Justices v. Murray, 76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 274, 278 (1870); Chi., B. & Q. R.R. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226, 242–46 (1897). ") However, the Supreme Court has indicated that, in cases involving a claim of a denial of constitutional rights, it is free to examine and review the evidence upon which the lower court based its conclusions, a position that under some circumstances could conflict with the principle of jury autonomy.[2](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-7/appeals-from-state-courts-to-the-supreme-court#fn2amd7 " See Time, Inc. v. Pape, 401 U.S. 279, 284–92 (1971). ")
Footnotes
1
The Justices v. Murray, 76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 274 , 278 (1870); Chi., B. & Q. R.R. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 , 242–46 (1897).
2
See Time, Inc. v. Pape, 401 U.S. 279 , 284–92 (1971).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.