Skip to main content
U.S. Constitution AnnotatedAmendment 26

Amendment 26 — The Vietnam War Voting Rights Act Amendments Of 1970 And Oregon V Mitchell

Primary source

Commentary below is sourced from the Cornell Legal Information Institute (LII) mirror of the U.S. Constitution Annotated, used per LII's robots.txt with 10-second crawl-delay compliance.

Commentary

| next

Twenty-Sixth Amendment

Section 1:

The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.

Section 2:

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

During the 1960s, public support for lowering the minimum voting age increased as the U.S. Armed Forces became directly involved in defending South Vietnam from North Vietnam and the Viet Cong guerilla forces. Although men as young as 18 could be drafted to fight in the Vietnam War, only a few states allowed persons under the age of 21 to vote.. ") As U.S. involvement in the war reached its peak in the late 1960s, President Lyndon B. Johnson wrote a message to Congress calling for an amendment to the Constitution lowering the voting age., Am. Presidency Project, >https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/special-message-the-congress-vote-eighteen-democracy-fulfilled-and-enriched. ") Referring to the ballot box as the “anvil of democracy, where government is shaped by the will of the people,” Johnson remarked that “reason does not permit us to ignore any longer the reality that eighteen-year-old young Americans are prepared—by education, by experience, by exposure to public affairs of their own land and all the world—to assume and exercise the privilege of voting.” , >https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951d029875154&view=1up&seq=3. ")

When extending the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in 1970, Congress included a provision lowering the age qualification to vote in all elections—federal, state, and local—to 18.. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits states from denying or abridging the right to vote on the basis of race or color. See 52 U.S.C. §§ 1030110314. ") In the findings section accompanying this provision, Congress explained that the law was necessary to protect the “inherent constitutional rights” of 18- to 20-year-old citizens, particularly in light of “the national defense responsibilities imposed upon such citizens.” Congress asserted that it possessed the authority to enact the youth enfranchisement provision because it was necessary to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment ’s equal protection and due process guarantees against the states. (discussing Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641 (1966), among other Supreme Court decisions); see also, e.g., id. at 6142 (statement of Sen. Moss) ( “Under the [ Fourteenth Amendment], Congress has the power to find that a distinction between those who are 18 to 21 and those who are over 21 is an invidious classification and, therefore, a denial of equal protection under the law.” ); id. at 5950 (amendment offered by Sen. Mansfield to the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970 to lower the minimum voting age to 18 in federal, state, and local elections).

")

On June 22, 1970, President Richard Nixon signed the Voting Rights Act Amendments into law but issued a statement questioning the constitutionality of the legislation’s provision lowering the voting age in all elections to 18., Am. Presidency Project, >https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-signing-the-voting-rights-act-amendments-1970. ") Nixon wrote, “Although I strongly favor the 18-year-old vote, I believe—along with most of the Nation’s leading constitutional scholars—that Congress has no power to enact it by simple statute, but rather it requires a constitutional amendment.” Nixon directed the U.S. Attorney General to file a lawsuit seeking a court’s judgment on the provision’s constitutionality and called upon Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution lowering the minimum voting age.

Subsequently, the Supreme Court considered several challenges to the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970, including Title III, which lowered the minimum voting age.. ") In a divided decision in the 1970 case Oregon v. Mitchell, the Supreme Court held that Congress was empowered to lower the age qualification in federal elections, but voided the application of Title III of the Act in all other elections as beyond congressional power.">Oregon, 400 U.S. at 117–18. None of the Justices’ opinions garnered a majority of votes. Justices William O. Douglas, William J. Brennan, Jr., Byron White, and Thurgood Marshall agreed that Congress could lower the minimum voting age in both federal and state elections. However, Chief Justice Warren E. Burger and Justices John Marshall Harlan, Potter Stewart, and Harry Blackmun agreed that none of Congress’s constitutional powers, including its power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, authorized it to lower the minimum voting age to 18 in federal or state elections. Justice Hugo Black cast the deciding votes in the case. He voted to uphold Title III insofar as it lowered the voting age in federal elections based on his view that Congress’s power under the Elections Clause in Article I, Section 4, Clause 1, as supplemented by the Necessary and Proper Clause, gave Congress the power to lower the age in federal elections. However, he voted to strike down Title III insofar as it lowered the voting age in state and local elections based on his view that Congress had not acted to enforce “the Civil War Amendments’ ban on racial discrimination.” See id. at 117–31. ") Confronted with the possibility that they might have to maintain two sets of registration books and incur the expense of running separate election systems for federal elections as compared to all other elections, many states were receptive to Congress proposing a constitutional amendment to establish a minimum age qualification of 18 for all elections.; H.R. Rep. No. 92-37, at 6–7 (1971) (observing that many states would have to amend their constitutions in order to lower their voting ages and that, in many cases, this could not be done before the next election). ")

Footnotes

1

Vietnam War, Naval Hist. & Heritage Command, >https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/wars-conflicts-and-operations/vietnam-war0.html.

2

Changes from Vietnam to Now, Selective Serv. Sys., >https://www.sss.gov/history-and-records/changes-from-vietnam-to-now/. …

Read the full annotation on Cornell LII

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.