Amendment 24 — Doctrine On Abolition Of Poll Tax

prev | next

Twenty-Fourth Amendment , Section 1:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

Twenty-Fourth Amendment , Section 2:

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Not long after ratification of the Amendment—applicable only to federal elections—Congress by statute authorized the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief against use of the poll tax as a means of racial discrimination in state elections,[1](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-24/doctrine-on-abolition-of-poll-tax#fn1amd24 " Voting Rights Act of 1965, § 10, 79 Stat. 442, 42 U.S.C. § 1973h. For the results of actions instituted by the Attorney General under direction of this section, see United States v. Texas, 252 F. Supp. 234 (W.D. Tex. 1966) (three-judge court), aff’d on other grounds, 384 U.S. 155 (1966); United States v. Alabama, 252 F. Supp. 95 (M.D. Ala. 1966) (three-judge court). ") and the Supreme Court held that the poll tax discriminated on the basis of wealth in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.[2](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-24/doctrine-on-abolition-of-poll-tax#fn2amd24 " Harper v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966) (invalid discrimination based on wealth). ")

In Harman v. Forssenius,[3](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-24/doctrine-on-abolition-of-poll-tax#fn3amd24 " 380 U.S. 528 (1965). ") the Court struck down a Virginia statute that eliminated the poll tax as an absolute qualification for voting in federal elections and gave federal voters the choice either of paying the tax or of filing a certificate of residence six months before the election. Viewing the latter requirement as imposing upon voters in federal elections an onerous requirement that was not imposed on those who continued to pay the tax, the Court unanimously held the law to conflict with the new Amendment by penalizing those who chose to exercise a right guaranteed them by the Amendment.

Footnotes

1

Voting Rights Act of 1965, § 10, 79 Stat. 442 , 42 U.S.C. § 1973h. For the results of actions instituted by the Attorney General under direction of this section, see United States v. Texas, 252 F. Supp. 234 (W.D. Tex. 1966) (three-judge court), aff’d on other grounds, 384 U.S. 155 (1966) ; United States v. Alabama, 252 F. Supp. 95 (M.D. Ala. 1966) (three-judge court).

2

Harper v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966) (invalid discrimination based on wealth).

3

380 U.S. 528 (1965) .