§ 52h.11 What are the review criteria for contract projects and proposals?
Primary source
Verbatim text below is from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR), a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the current version with the eCFR before relying on it for any legal matter.
Full Text
(a) In carrying out its review of a project concept under § 52h.10(a) or § 52h.10(b), the peer review group shall take into account, among other pertinent factors:
(1) The significance from a scientific or technical standpoint of the goals of the proposed research or development activity;
(2) The availability of the technology and other resources necessary to achieve those goals;
(3) The extent to which there are identified, practical uses for the anticipated results of the activity; and
(4) Where the review includes the project approach, the adequacy of the methodology to be utilized in carrying out the activity.
(b) In carrying out its review of unsolicited contract proposals under § 52h.9, the peer review group shall take into account, among other pertinent factors, the criteria in § 52h.8 which are relevant to the particular proposals.
(c) In carrying out its review of solicited proposals under § 52h.10(a) or (b), the peer review group shall evaluate each proposal in accordance with the criteria set forth in the request for proposals.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.