Skip to main content
SCOTUS Case

Zschernig v. Miller

Primary source

Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.

Background

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1968 United States Supreme Court case

Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429 (1968), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated an Oregon statute for unconstitutionally intruding into the federal realm of foreign affairs even though the statute did not conflict with any federal treaty or statute.

Introduction

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zschernig_v._Miller&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Introduction")
]

An Oregon resident died and their only heirs were residents of East Germany . When the heirs tried to claim their inheritance, the State Land Board attempted to escheat the funds because East Germany would not allow the inheritance if the countries involved were reversed.

Facts of the case

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zschernig_v._Miller&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Facts of the case")
]

The Oregon law at issue in the case provided that a nonresident alien could not inherit property from an Oregon decedent unless: 1) the alien's government granted Americans the right to inherit on the same terms as its own citizens, 2) the alien's government gave Americans the right to receive payment in the U.S. from foreign funds, and 3) the alien was able to receive "the benefit, use or control" of the Oregon bequest "without confiscation" by the alien's government.

Decision

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zschernig_v._Miller&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: Decision")
]

The court found the law unconstitutional because of "intrusion by the State into the field of foreign affairs which the Constitution entrusts to the President and the Congress." The Supreme Court applied Zschernig in _American Insurance Association v. Garamendi _, a 2003 case, although they relied more on Justice Harlan's concurring opinion in Zschernig than on the majority's reasoning.

See also

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zschernig_v._Miller&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: See also")
]

References

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zschernig_v._Miller&action=edit&section=5 "Edit section: References")
]

  1. Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429 (1968).  This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document .
  2. 10 U.S. Op. Off. Legal Counsel 49, 61-62 (1986)
  3. Zschernig, 389 U.S. at 432.

External links

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zschernig_v._Miller&action=edit&section=6 "Edit section: External links")
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zschernig_v._Miller&oldid=1361870409 "

Categories :

Hidden categories:

Search

Search

Zschernig v. Miller

Add languages Add topic

Read the full Wikipedia article

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.