Westside School District v. Mergens
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens
(Redirected from Westside School District v. Mergens )
This article **needs more citations
**. Please help improve this article
by adding citations to reliable sources
. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed
.
Find sources: "Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens"
– news
· newspapers
· books
· scholar
· JSTOR (August 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message
)
Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving a school district's ability to hold classes on Bible study after school.
Contents
Background
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westside_Community_Board_of_Education_v._Mergens&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Background")
Westside High School , in District 66 , located in Omaha , Nebraska , refused to allow a group of students to form a Christian Bible Study Club within their school. Bridget Mergens is the name of the student who initiated the process to start the club. She was a senior at the time. It was decided that the club could not take place because they would not allow a staff member to sponsor it (staff sponsoring was required or the club meetings could not take place at the school). The students argued that the district's decision was in violation of the federal Equal Access Act requiring that groups seeking to express messages containing "religious, political, philosophical, or other content" not be denied the ability to form clubs.
Opinion of the Court
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westside_Community_Board_of_Education_v._Mergens&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")
In an 8–1 decision, the Court held that denying equal access to the religious club violated the Equal Access Act, and that treating a religious club equally, including providing a sponsor like other clubs, would not constitute an endorsement of religion prohibited by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment .
The school's situation was placed under the Equal Access Act because it allowed other ‘limited open forums’. In Part III of Justice O'Connor 's opinion, which did not reach a majority of the Court, she applied the Lemon Test to find that the Equal Access Act is constitutional as applied in this case. Justice Kennedy , meanwhile, analyzed the application of the Act under different Court precedents, focusing more upon "coercion".
Dissent
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westside_Community_Board_of_Education_v._Mergens&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: Dissent")
Justice Stevens , in a dissenting opinion, would have avoided the Establishment Clause issue.
See also
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westside_Community_Board_of_Education_v._Mergens&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: See also")
References
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westside_Community_Board_of_Education_v._Mergens&action=edit§ion=5 "Edit section: References")
- ↑ Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 (1990).
- ↑ Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens. "Board of Educ. V. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 (1990)" . Retrieved October 5, 2021.
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westside_Community_Board_of_Education_v._Mergens&action=edit§ion=6 "Edit section: External links")
- Text of Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 (1990) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westside_Community_Board_of_Education_v._Mergens&oldid=1351348885 "
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.