Skip to main content
SCOTUS Case

Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP

Primary source

Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.

Background

Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP

(Redirected from Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP )

Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, often shortened to Verizon v. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398 (2004), is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the field of Antitrust law. It held that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 had not modified the framework of the Sherman Act , preserving claims that satisfy established antitrust standards without creating new claims that go beyond those standards. It also refused to extend the essential facilities doctrine beyond the facts of the _Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. _ case.

See also

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: See also")

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: External links")

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP&oldid=1351334151 "

Read the full Wikipedia article

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.