Tibble v. Edison Int’l
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Tibble v. Edison International
Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. 523 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty."
Opinion of the Court
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibble_v._Edison_International&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")
Associate Justice Stephen Breyer authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.
References
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibble_v._Edison_International&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: References")
- ↑ "Tibble v. Edison International" .
- ↑ "Tibble et al. v. Edison International et al" (PDF). United States Supreme Court . May 18, 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 8, 2022.
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibble_v._Edison_International&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: External links")
Text of Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. 523 (2015) is available from: CourtListener Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibble_v._Edison_International&oldid=1330678758 "
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.