Back to Cases

Texas v. Johnson

491 U.S. 397 (1989)

Federal & State Law Editorial TeamLast reviewed: July 2026

Opinion Summary

Held in a 5-4 decision that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag outside the Republican National Convention. The Court held that the government may not prohibit expression simply because society finds it disagreeable. Invalidated flag desecration statutes in 48 states.

About this case

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1989 U.S. Supreme Court case concerning free speech

1989 United States Supreme Court case

English Wikisource has original text related to this article:

**Texas v. Johnson **

Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution , as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech .

Activist Gregory Lee Johnson was convicted for burning an American flag during a protest outside the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas , and was fined $2,000 and sentenced to one year in jail in accordance with Texas law. Justice William Brennan wrote for the five-justice majority that Johnson's flag burning was protected under freedom of speech , and therefore the state could not censor Johnson nor punish him for his actions.

The ruling invalidated laws against desecrating the American flag, which at the time were enforced in 48 of the 50 states. The ruling was unpopular with the general public and lawmakers, with President George H. W. Bush calling flag burning "dead wrong". The ruling was challenged by Congress, which passed the Flag Protection Act later that year, making flag desecration a federal crime. The law's constitutionality was contested before the Supreme Court, which again affirmed in _United States v. Eichman _ (1990) that flag burning was a protected form of free speech and struck down the Flag Protection Act as violating the First Amendment . In the years following the ruling, Congress several times considered the Flag Desecration Amendment , which would have amended the U.S. Constitution to make flag burning illegal, but never passed it. The issue of flag burning remained controversial decades later, and it is still used as a form of protest.[2]

_Time _ magazine described Texas v. Johnson as one of the best Supreme Court decisions since 1960,[3] with legal scholars since stating that "Freedom of speech applies to symbolic expression, such as displaying flags, burning flags, wearing armbands, burning crosses, and the like."[4]

Background

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Texas_v._Johnson&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")
]

Johnson (right) with attorney Kunstler, c. 1989

On August 22, 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson , then a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade , participated in a political demonstration during the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas, protesting the policies of the Reagan administration .[5] The protestors marched through the streets, chanting political slogans and staging "die-ins " at several corporate buildings to dramatize the effects of nuclear war . Several protestors occasionally stopped to spray-paint walls and knock over potted plants, although Johnson himself took no part in those actions.[6] At the Mercantile Bank Building , protestors removed the American flag from the flagpole outside. An unidentified protestor handed the flag to Johnson, who hid it under his shirt.

When the protestors reached Dallas City Hall , Johnson poured kerosene on the flag and set it on fire. During the burning of the flag, protestors shouted phrases such as, "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you, you stand for plunder, you will go under."[7] No one was injured during the demonstration, though some witnesses to the flag burning felt deeply offended.[8] Johnson was arrested within a half-hour of igniting the flag,[9] and an additional one hundred protestors were arrested "without any resistance".[10] One spectator, a Korean War veteran named Daniel Walker, gathered the remains of the flag and buried them in the backyard of his home in Fort Worth .[11] [b]

Johnson was charged with violating the Texas flag desecration statute, which prohibited the vandalism of respected or venerated objects.[13] Johnson was the only individual at the protest to be criminally charged.[14] Also, he was initially indicted on one count of disorderly conduct , but that charge was eventually dropped. On December 13, 1984, a six-person jury found Johnson guilty of flag desecration, and he was subsequently sentenced to one year in jail and fined $2,000.[15] Johnson appealed his conviction to the Fifth Court of Appeals of Texas , but was again found criminally liable. He then appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals , which overruled his conviction, finding that his First Amendment rights had been violated.[16] That court found that Johnson's actions were symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment, writing that: "a government cannot mandate by fiat a feeling of unity in its citizens. Therefore that very same government cannot carve out a symbol of unity and prescribe a set of approved messages to be associated with that symbol."[17] The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals also affirmed that his actions did not constitute a breach of the peace .[18]

Texas filed a writ of _certiorari _ asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case,[19] which was granted in 1988.[20]

Opinion of the Court

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Texas_v._Johnson&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")
]

William J. Brennan, Jr. wrote for the Court's majority.

Oral arguments were held on March 21, 1989. David D. Cole and William Kunstler argued the case on behalf of Gregory Lee Johnson, and Kathi Alyce Drew argued on behalf of the state of Texas.[21] During oral arguments, the state defended its statute on two grounds: first, states had a compelling interest in preserving a venerated national symbol ; and second, the state had a compelling interest in preventing breaches of peace.[22] The Supreme Court handed down a 5–4 opinion on June 21, 1989 in favor of Johnson. Justice William Brennan authored a majority opinion

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

Related Cases

Marbury v. Madison

5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)

Established the principle of judicial review, empowering federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Marshall held that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and when a statute conflicts with it, the courts must give effect to the Constitution. This foundational decision made the judiciary a coequal branch of government.

McCulloch v. Maryland

17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819)

Upheld the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States under the Necessary and Proper Clause and held that states cannot tax federal institutions. Chief Justice Marshall established a broad interpretation of congressional power, declaring that the federal government possesses implied powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution.

Dred Scott v. Sandford

60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)

Held that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens of the United States and had no standing to sue in federal court. Chief Justice Taney also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. Widely condemned as the worst Supreme Court decision in history, it inflamed sectional tensions and contributed to the onset of the Civil War. Effectively overruled by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Plessy v. Ferguson

163 U.S. 537 (1896)

Upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the 'separate but equal' doctrine. The Court ruled that Louisiana's law requiring separate railway cars for Black and white passengers did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Harlan's lone dissent declared the Constitution 'color-blind.' Overruled by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

Lochner v. New York

198 U.S. 45 (1905)

Struck down a New York law limiting bakery workers to a 60-hour work week, holding it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of liberty of contract. Inaugurated the 'Lochner era' of aggressive judicial review of economic regulations, which lasted until the late 1930s. Now widely criticized as judicial overreach.

Citation Network

Full network

2 direct citation connections found for this case.

Case Information

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Court Level
Supreme Court of the United States
Date Decided
Wednesday, June 21, 1989
Citation
491 U.S. 397 (1989)
Jurisdiction
United States Federal

Legal Topics

civil rights

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.