Teague v. Lane

This article is missing information about the background and circumstances of the case. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the talk page . (April 2015)

Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the application of newly announced rules of law in habeas corpus proceedings. This case addresses the Federal Court's threshold standard of deciding whether Constitutional claims will be heard. Application of the "Teague test" at the most basic level limits habeas corpus.

Background

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teague_v._Lane&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")

The appeal was from a black defendant who was convicted by an all white jury in Illinois in a state court located in Cook County . The prosecutor had used all 10 of his peremptory challenges to exclude African American jurors but claimed he was trying to get a balance of men and women on the jury.

Opinion of the Court

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teague_v._Lane&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")

The majority held that the actions of the prosecutor did not follow contemporary criminal procedure but that the Batson challenge principle should not be applied retroactively.

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teague_v._Lane&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: External links")

• Text of Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989) is available from: Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teague_v._Lane&oldid=1351969090 "