Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
SCOTUS Case

Southern Union Co. v. United States

Primary source

Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.

Background

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2012 United States Supreme Court case

Southern Union Co. v. United States, 567 U.S. 343 (2012), was a Supreme Court decision that applied the rule set out in _Apprendi v. New Jersey _—that certain non-conviction elements of a crime must be proved to a jury—to criminal penalties. The 6–3 decision was authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor .

Background

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southern_Union_Co._v._United_States&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")
]

Southern Union Company was convicted of storing hazardous liquid mercury without a permit, "on or about September 19, 2002 to October 19, 2004," in violation of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act . The jury was not asked to determine the exact duration of the violation. In sentencing, the probation office set a maximum fine of $38.1 million, calculated by assessing the $50,000 maximum daily fine for each of the 762 days between September 19, 2002, and October 19, 2004. Respondent appealed on the basis that the jury never determined the exact duration of the violation. The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld the sentence, agreeing that the jury had not determined the duration of the violation, but holding that Apprendi did not apply to criminal fines.

The Supreme Court reversed, holding there is no principled distinction between criminal fines and imprisonment for the purpose of Apprendi because Apprendi requires that any fact other than a prior conviction that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to the jury and determined beyond a reasonable doubt. The rule preserves the historic fact-finding function of the jury, deciding that where a fine is sufficiently substantial to trigger the Sixth Amendment jury-trial guarantee, Apprendi applies.

See also

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southern_Union_Co._v._United_States&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: See also")
]

References

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southern_Union_Co._v._United_States&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: References")
]

  1. ↑ Southern Union Co. v. United States, 567 U.S. 343 (2012).
  2. ↑ 42 U.S.C.  § 6901 et seq.
  3. ↑ United States v. Southern Union Co., 630 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2010).

Further reading

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southern_Union_Co._v._United_States&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: Further reading")
]

  • Applebaum, Brynn (2015). "Criminal Asset Forfeiture and the Sixth Amendment after Southern Union and Alleyne: State-Level Ramifications". _Vand. L. Rev. _ 68 (2): 549–574.

External links

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southern_Union_Co._v._United_States&action=edit&section=5 "Edit section: External links")
]

United States environmental law

Supreme Court

decisions

Major
federal legislation ,
treaties,
and lower court
decisions

…

Read the full Wikipedia article

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.