Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1920 United States Supreme Court case
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which Silverthorne had attempted to evade paying taxes. Federal agents illegally seized tax books from Silverthorne and created copies of the records. The ruling, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. , was that any evidence obtained, even indirectly, from an illegal search was inadmissible in court. He reasoned that otherwise, police would have an incentive to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to obtain derivatives of the illegally obtained evidence. This precedent later became known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine," and is an extension of the exclusionary rule .
Chief Justice Edward Douglass White and Associate Justice Mahlon Pitney dissented without a written opinion.
See also
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silverthorne_Lumber_Co._v._United_States&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: See also")
]
_Wong Sun v. United States _, 371 U.S. 471 (1963)
Further reading
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silverthorne_Lumber_Co._v._United_States&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Further reading")
]
- Killian, B. J. (1982). "United States v. Crews: Fruit of the Poisonous Tree—A New Wrinkle?". Idaho Law Review. 18: 151. ISSN 0019-1205 .
References
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silverthorne_Lumber_Co._v._United_States&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: References")
]
- ↑ Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920).
- ↑ _Nardone v. United States _, 308 U.S. 338 (1939).
External links
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silverthorne_Lumber_Co._v._United_States&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: External links")
]
- Works related to Silverthorne Lumber Company v. United States at Wikisource
- Text of Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress
hide
United States Fourth Amendment case law
show
Scope of the Fourth Amendment
Definition of search
- _Boyd v. United States _ (1886)
- _United States v. Lee _ (1927)
- _Olmstead v. United States _ (1928)
- _Abel v. United States _ (1960)
- _Silverman v. United States _ (1961)
- _Katz v. United States _ (1967)
- _United States v. Knotts _ (1983)
- _United States v. Place _ (1983)
- _United States v. Karo _ (1984)
- _California v. Greenwood _ (1988)
- _Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Ass'n _ (1989)
- _United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez _ (1990)
- _Bond v. United States _ (2000)
- _Kyllo v. United States _ (2001)
- _Illinois v. Caballes _ (2005)
- _United States v. Jones _ (2012)
- _Florida v. Jardines _ (2013)
- _Klayman v. Obama _ (D.D.C. 2013)
- _American Civil Liberties Union v. Clapper _ (D.D.C. 2013)
Definition of seizure
- _Counselman v. Hitchcock _ (1892)
- _Hale v. Henkel _ (1906)
- _Terry v. Ohio _ (1968)
- _United States v. Mendenhall _ (1980)
- _Florida v. Royer _ (1983)
- _INS v. Delgado _ (1984)
- _California v. Hodari D. _ (1991)
- _Florida v. Bostick _ (1991)
- _Soldal v. Cook County _ (1992)
- _United States v. Drayton _ (2002)
- _Brendlin v. California _ (2007)
- _Torres v. Madrid _ (2021)
Third-party entry
- _Wilson v. Layne _ (1999)
Fourth Amendment standing
- _Rakas v. Illinois _ (1978)
- _Byrd v. United States _ (2018)
show
Warrant requirement
- _Johnson v. United States _ (1948)
- _Franks v. Delaware _ (1978)
- _Ybarra v. Illinois _ (1979)
- _Maryland v. Garrison _ (1987)
- _United States v. Grubbs _ (2006)
- _Los Angeles County v. Rettelle _ (2006)
show
Exceptions to warrant requirement
show
Seizures
hide
Remedies
Civil suit
show
Incorporation against States
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silverthorne_Lumber_Co._v._United_States&oldid=1351335241 "
…
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.