Skip to main content
SCOTUS Case

Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

Primary source

Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.

Background

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2001 United States Supreme Court case

English Wikisource has original text related to this article:

**Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. **

Semtek v. Lockheed Martin, 531 U.S. 497 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that federal common law governs the preclusive effect of a judgment entered in a federal court sitting in diversity.

Background

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Semtek_International_Inc._v._Lockheed_Martin_Corp.&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")
]

Petitioners Semtek International Incorporated filed a complaint against Lockheed Martin in California state court, alleging a breach of contract. The case was removed to the local federal district court due to the diversity of citizenship in the case. The trial judge then dismissed the complaint, writing that California's 2-year statute of limitations made the claim "barred".

Semtek International had also filed a claim in Maryland's state court. The court here also dismissed the complaint, but on the grounds that "the res judicata effect" precludes this separate claim in a different state. Since another federal court had dismissed a similar action already, Semtek could not proceed in a different court on virtually similar contentions.

Opinion of the Court

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Semtek_International_Inc._v._Lockheed_Martin_Corp.&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")
]

Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court, reversing the decision of the Maryland courts. Scalia wrote that there was no final "judgment on the merits" in the California case and thus the Maryland trial was not precluded. A reading of the appropriate rule could be seen as still permitting other actions. Therefore, Semtek was entitled to a trial before the Maryland courts and the case was remanded with such instructions.

See also

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Semtek_International_Inc._v._Lockheed_Martin_Corp.&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: See also")
]

References

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Semtek_International_Inc._v._Lockheed_Martin_Corp.&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: References")
]

  1. 531 U.S. at 499.
  2. 531 U.S. at 500.
  3. 531 U.S. at 507.

External links

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Semtek_International_Inc._v._Lockheed_Martin_Corp.&action=edit&section=5 "Edit section: External links")
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Semtek_International_Inc._v._Lockheed_Martin_Corp.&oldid=1351929905 "

Categories :

Hidden categories:

Search

Search

Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

Add languages Add topic

Read the full Wikipedia article

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.