Parker v. Brown

1943 United States Supreme Court case

Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of United States antitrust law . It held that actions taken by state governments were exempt from the scope of the Sherman Act .

The case was an appeal from a decree of a district court of three judges enjoining the enforcement, against the appellee, of a marketing program adopted pursuant to the California Agricultural Prorate Act.

The case led to the Parker immunity doctrine . The Supreme Court clarified its position in later judgments.

External links

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parker_v._Brown&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: External links")
]

• Works related to Parker v. Brown at Wikisource
• Text of Parker v. Brown, U.S. 341 (1943) is available from: Findlaw Internet Archive (docket files) Justia

United States antitrust law

• History

• Interstate Commerce Commission (1887–1996)

• Bureau of Corporations (1903–1915)

• Pujo Committee (1912–1913)

• Federal Trade Commission (1914–)

• U.S. Justice Department Antitrust Division (1919–)

• U.S. Senate Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee

• U.S. House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee

Statutes and
regulations

• Interstate Commerce Act of 1887

• Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)

• Elkins Act (1903)

• Expediting Act (1903)

• Publicity In Taking Evidence Act (1913)

• Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914

• Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914

• Webb–Pomerene Act (1918)

• Willis Graham Act (1921)

• Capper–Volstead Act (1922)

• Robinson–Patman Act (1936)

• Wheeler–Lea Act (1938)

• McCarran–Ferguson Act (1945)

• Celler–Kefauver Act (1950)

• Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961

• Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970

• Tunney Act (1974)

• Hart–Scott–Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (1976)

• National Cooperative Research and Production Act (1993)

• Executive Order 14036 (2021)

Supreme Court
case law

Other federal
case law

• _United States v. Motion Picture Patents Co. _ (1915)
• _United States v. Consolidated Music Corporation _ (1922)
• _United States v. Vehicular Parking Ltd. _ (1944)
• _United States v. Alcoa _ (1945)
• _Gamco, Inc. v. Providence Fruit & Produce Building, Inc. _ (1952)
• _United States v. Morgan _ (1953)
• _United States v. Krasnov _ (1956)
• _United States v. Huck Mfg. Co. _ (1965)
• _Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n _ (1977)
• _SmithKline Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co. _ (1978)
• _United States v. Westinghouse Electric Co. _ (1981)
• _United States v. AT&T _ (1982)
• _Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League _ (1983)
• _United States v. Syufy Enterprises _ (1990)
• _Wilk v. American Medical Association _ (1990)
• _A.D. Bedell Wholesale Co., Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc. _ (2001)
• _United States v. Microsoft Corp. _ (2001)
• _Fraser v. Major League Soccer _ (2002)
• _LePage's, Inc. v. 3M _ (2003)
• _Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp. _ (2005)
• _United States v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc. _ (2005)
• _Tritent International Corp. v. Kentucky _ (2006)
• _Wallace v. International Business Machines Corp. _ (2006)
• De Beers antitrust litigation (2008)
• _Redbox Automated Retail LLC v. Universal City Studios LLLP _ (2009)
• _Princo Corp. v. ITC _ (2010)
• _United States v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al. _ (2011)
• _United States v. Apple Inc. _ (2013)
• _O'Bannon v. NCAA _ (2015)
• _United States v. AT&T _ (2015)
• _FTC v. Qualcomm _ (2020)
• _New York v. Deutsche Telekom _ (2020)
• _Epic Games v. Apple _ (2021)
• _Burnett v. National Association of Realtors _ (2023)
• _Epic Games v. Google _ (2023)
• _FTC v. Microsoft _ (2023)
• _United States v. Google LLC _ (2024)
• _United States v. Google LLC "United States v. Google

…