Morey v. Doud
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Morey v. Doud
Morey v. Doud, 354 U.S. 457 (1957), was a U.S. Supreme Court case where Doud and two partners sold 'Bondified' brand money orders in Illinois, directly or through agents such as drug and grocery stores. A state law required any seller or issuer of money orders to secure a license and submit to state regulation, except that the statute, by name, explicitly exempted the American Express Company from these requirements.
Doud, his partners and one of his agents, fearing prosecution under the law, sued the state, arguing the law was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court agreed, finding the special exemption only for American Express violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment .
It was overruled by City of New Orleans v. Dukes
_ in 1976.[citation needed
_]
See also
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morey_v._Doud&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: See also")
References
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morey_v._Doud&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: References")
English Wikisource has original text related to this article:
**Morey v. Doud **
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morey_v._Doud&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: External links")
- Text of Morey v. Doud, 354 U.S. 457 (1957) is available from: Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morey_v._Doud&oldid=1351942422 "
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.