Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield

Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Indian Child Welfare Act governed adoptions of Indian children. It ruled that a tribal court had jurisdiction over a state court, regardless of the location of birth of the child, if the child or the natural parents resided on the reservation.

Contents

• 1 Background

  • 1.1 History of removal

  • 1.2 Indian Child Welfare Act

  • 1.3 Lower courts

• 2 Opinion of the Court

  • 2.1 Dissent

• 3 Subsequent developments

• 4 Notes

• 5 References

• 6 External links

Background

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi_Band_of_Choctaw_Indians_v._Holyfield&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")

History of removal

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi_Band_of_Choctaw_Indians_v._Holyfield&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: History of removal")

From 1850 to about 1960, many American Indian children were forcibly taken from their families and their tribes to go to Indian boarding schools, in what has been described as efforts at forced assimilation as well as education. At the schools, Indian children were expected to speak English and practice Christianity; they were punished for speaking their own languages. Reformers wanted the Indians to choose "assimilation over extinction." In 1890 approximately 12,000 Indian children were attending Indian boarding schools .

According to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs:

The general purpose of the Government is the preparation of Indian youth for assimilation into the national life by such a course in training as will prepare them for the duties and privileges of American citizenship."

By 1928 assimilation through the boarding schools was no longer popular with the public, and the Meriam Report condemned the practice of forcibly removing Indian children from their families.

This type of removal ended during the 1930s, although Indian boarding schools continued to enroll numerous children.

After World War II , the intervention of state social welfare workers into overseeing Indian families resulted in another type of removal. Indian children were removed from their families when social workers judged the conditions were poor for the child, and placed in foster care or for adoption. Often the social workers did not understand tribal culture and the role of extended family members in the care of the child.

In many cases, the dominant non-Indian culture justified the removal in order to protect or rescue the children from what they claimed was barbarism on the reservation. Indian children were placed outside the home at a rate five times greater than for non-Indian children. By the 1970s, an estimated 25 to 35% of Indian children were placed in foster care at some point, usually with non-Indian families. Children who were adopted out were overwhelmingly adopted by non-Indian families, cutting them off from their culture, and threatening the survival of the tribes.

Indian Child Welfare Act

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi_Band_of_Choctaw_Indians_v._Holyfield&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: Indian Child Welfare Act")

See also: Indian Child Welfare Act

Native American tribes increasingly protested against the practice of removing their children and placing them with non-Native families. They organized and lobbied to gain relief from this practice. In 1978, Congress passed the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). This law was enacted to protect tribes and their children; due to the high rate of Indian children who were being removed from their families and placed with non-Indian families, the children's Indian identities were lost and tribe survival was being threatened. In many cases, the children were removed even from families who resided on Indian reservations , where the state government did not have legal jurisdiction . Many parents and children were denied due process , either by the state agency or the state court, leading to a finding by Congress that the states had failed to recognize tribal culture, relations, and standards.

Congress established both procedural and substantive provisions in the ICWA that are designed to 1) eliminate the need to remove Indian children due to cultural bias; 2) try to ensure that Indian children are placed in foster and adoptive homes that reflect Indian culture; and 3) to promote the use of tribal, rather than state, courts to adjudicate Indian child custody proceedings.

The ICWA gives the tribal court exclusive jurisdiction for children who are born or who live on tribal land, and concurrent jurisdiction with state courts in all other cases.

Lower courts

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi_Band_of_Choctaw_Indians_v._Holyfield&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: Lower courts")

In 1985, a set of Indian twins were born in Harrison County , Mississippi , 200 miles from the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians . The mother had moved to Harrison County for the sole purpose of giving birth off the reservation and for placing the twins with the Holyfields, as she was unable to find a relative or family on the reservation willing to adopt both the children to keep them together. She was unable to raise them herself. The natural parents, both Choctaw, were not married and already had other children. Both parents executed a consent for adoption in the Harrison County Chancery Court . The Holyfields, a non-Indian couple, adopted the twins as arranged. The state court signed a final decree of adoption in early 1986.

Two months later, the tribe moved to vacate the adoption, stating that the tribal court had exclusive jurisdiction. The state trial court denied their motion, noting that the children had never lived on the reservation and were not born there. The tribe appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court , which affirmed the state trial court's decision. The tribe appealed to the Supreme Court , which granted certiorari .

Opinion of the Court

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi_Band_of_Choctaw_Indians_v._Holyfield&action=edit&section=5 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")

Justice William J. Brennan delivered the opinion of the court. Brennan reviewed th

…