Skip to main content
SCOTUS Case

Miller-El v. Dretke

Primary source

Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.

Background

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2005 United States Supreme Court case

Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case that clarified the constitutional limitations on the use by prosecutors of peremptory challenges and of the Texas procedure termed the "jury shuffle."

Background

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miller-El_v._Dretke&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")
]

Thomas Miller-El was charged with capital murder committed in the course of a robbery. After _voir dire _, Miller-El moved to strike the entire jury because the prosecution had used its peremptory challenges to strike ten of the eleven African-Americans who were eligible to serve on the jury. This motion was denied, and Miller-El was subsequently found guilty and sentenced to death.

Opinion of the Court

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miller-El_v._Dretke&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")
]

In 1986, the Supreme Court ruled in _Batson v. Kentucky _ that a prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges may not be used to exclude jurors on the basis of race. Miller-El appealed based on the Batson criteria and asked that his conviction be overturned. In June 2005, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 to overturn Miller-El's death sentence, finding his jury selection process had been tainted by racial bias.

The Court had held in Batson that a defendant could rely on "all relevant circumstances" in making out a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination. Miller-El clarified that "all relevant circumstances" included evidence outside "the four corners of the case." Specifically, the Court allowed statistical analysis of the venire, side-by-side comparison of struck and empaneled jurors, disparate questioning, and evidence of historical discrimination.

In 2008, Miller-El pleaded guilty to the 1985 murder of Douglas Walker, a Holiday Inn clerk who had been bound, gagged, then shot to death. The murder of Walker was the crime that Miller-El was originally sent to death row for.

The Court extended the holding of Miller-El in _Snyder v. Louisiana _.

References

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miller-El_v._Dretke&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: References")
]

  1. Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005).
  2. Miller-El, 545 U.S. at 240.
  3. Miller-El, 545 U.S. at 240-41.
  4. Miller-El, 545 U.S. at 241.
  5. Miller-El, 545 U.S. at 255.
  6. Miller-El, 545 U.S. at 263.
  7. "Former death row inmate pleads guilty to 1985 crime" . The Dallas Morning News. Plainview Herald.

External links

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miller-El_v._Dretke&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: External links")
]

United States equal protection and criminal procedure case law

Discrimination in jury selection

  • *Glasser interpreted the Impartial Jury Clause of the Sixth Amendment. **Thiel and Edmonson were civil cases.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miller-El_v._Dretke&oldid=1351327669 "

Categories :

Hidden categories:

Search

Search

Miller-El v. Dretke

Add languages Add topic

Read the full Wikipedia article

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.