McDonald v. Smith
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1985 United States Supreme Court case
McDonald v. Smith, 472 U.S. 479 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the right to petition does not provide absolute immunity to petitioners; it is subject to the same restrictions as other First Amendment rights.
Background
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=McDonald_v._Smith&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Background")
]
In 1981, David Smith brought a libel suit against Robert McDonald claiming that Mcdonald had included knowing and malicious lies in a letter to the President concerning Smith's possible appointment as a United States attorney . Smith claimed that these libelous claims damaged both his chances of appointment and his reputation and career. McDonald first had the case removed to federal court on the basis of diversity of citizenship . Since the alleged libel was contained in a letter (petition) to the President, he moved for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that the Petition Clause of the First Amendment protected his right to express his views without limitation as long as it was part of a constitutionally protected petition.
Opinion of the Court
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=McDonald_v._Smith&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")
]
The issue before the Court was whether the right to petition the government granted absolute immunity from liability.
The Court decided 8–0 (Justice Powell took no part in the case) that the right to petition was subject to the same legal limitations that the rights to speech and the press are as previously decided in _New York Times Co. v. Sullivan _ (1964). Therefore, claims made in the original letter, or in any similar petition, were and are subject to libel lawsuits to be judged on their merits. Chief Justice Burger delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other members joined. Justice Brennan wrote a concurrence, joined by Justices Marshall and Blackmun .
References
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=McDonald_v._Smith&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: References")
]
- ↑ Pring, George William; Canan, Penelope (1996). SLAPPs: Getting Sued for Speaking Out . Temple University Press. pp. 22–23. ISBN 978-1-56639-369-0 .
- ↑ California (State). California. Court of Appeal (4th Appellate District). Division 2. Records and Briefs: D004129, Other . pp. 12–13.
External links
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=McDonald_v._Smith&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: External links")
]
- Text of McDonald v. Smith, 472 U.S. 479 (1985) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Oyez (oral argument audio)
U.S. Supreme Court Assemble and Petition Clause case law
**First Amendment to the United States Constitution **
Freedom of assembly
Freedom of association
Freedom to petition
- _United States v. Cruikshank _ (1876)
- _Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. _ (1961)
- _NAACP v. Button _ (1963)
- _Edwards v. South Carolina _ (1963)
- _United Mine Workers v. Pennington _ (1965)
- _Cox v. Louisiana _ (1965)
- _California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited _ (1972)
- _McDonald v. Smith _ (1985)
- _Meyer v. Grant _ (1988)
- _Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc. _ (1999)
- _Doe v. Reed _ (2010)
- _Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri _ (2011)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=McDonald_v._Smith&oldid=1351332769 "
Hidden categories:
Search
Search
McDonald v. Smith
Add languages Add topic
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.