Loving v. Commonwealth (Trial Court)

No. 6163 (Va. Cir. Ct. 1959)

Federal & State Law Editorial TeamLast reviewed: July 2026

Opinion Summary

The Virginia trial court convicted Richard and Mildred Loving of violating Virginia's Racial Integrity Act by marrying across racial lines. Judge Bazile wrote that 'Almighty God created the races' and 'did not intend for the races to mix.' The conviction was upheld by the Virginia Supreme Court before being overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.

About this case

Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia

Article
Talk

Look for Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia on one of Wikipedia's sister projects :

[Wiktionary](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:Search/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "wiktionary:Special:Search/Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia")
 (dictionary)

[Wikibooks](https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special:Search/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "wikibooks:Special:Search/Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia")
 (textbooks)

[Wikiquote](https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:Search/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "wikiquote:Special:Search/Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia")
 (quotations)

[Wikisource](https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Special:Search/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "wikisource:Special:Search/Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia")
 (library)

[Wikiversity](https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special:Search/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "wikiversity:Special:Search/Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia")
 (learning resources)

[Commons](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "commons:Special:Search/Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia")
 (media)

[Wikivoyage](https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Special:Search/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "wikivoyage:Special:Search/Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia")
 (travel guide)

[Wikidata](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Search/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "wikidata:Special:Search/Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia")
 (linked database)

[Wikispecies](https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "wikispecies:Special:Search/Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia")
 (species directory)

Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.

You need to log in or create an account and be autoconfirmed to create new articles. Alternatively, you can use the article wizard to submit a draft for review, or request a new article .
Search for "Loving v. Commonwealth Virginia" in existing articles.
Look for pages within Wikipedia that link to this title .

Other reasons this message may be displayed:

If a page was recently created here, it may not be visible yet because of a delay in updating the database; wait a few minutes or try the purge function .
Titles on Wikipedia are **case sensitive ** except for the first character; please check alternative capitalizations and consider adding a redirect here to the correct title.
If the page has been deleted, check the deletion log , and see Why was the page I created deleted?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Commonwealth_Virginia "

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

Related Cases

Marbury v. Madison

5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)

Established the principle of judicial review, empowering federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Marshall held that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and when a statute conflicts with it, the courts must give effect to the Constitution. This foundational decision made the judiciary a coequal branch of government.

McCulloch v. Maryland

17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819)

Upheld the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States under the Necessary and Proper Clause and held that states cannot tax federal institutions. Chief Justice Marshall established a broad interpretation of congressional power, declaring that the federal government possesses implied powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution.

Dred Scott v. Sandford

60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)

Held that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens of the United States and had no standing to sue in federal court. Chief Justice Taney also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. Widely condemned as the worst Supreme Court decision in history, it inflamed sectional tensions and contributed to the onset of the Civil War. Effectively overruled by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Plessy v. Ferguson

163 U.S. 537 (1896)

Upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the 'separate but equal' doctrine. The Court ruled that Louisiana's law requiring separate railway cars for Black and white passengers did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Harlan's lone dissent declared the Constitution 'color-blind.' Overruled by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

Lochner v. New York

198 U.S. 45 (1905)

Struck down a New York law limiting bakery workers to a 60-hour work week, holding it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of liberty of contract. Inaugurated the 'Lochner era' of aggressive judicial review of economic regulations, which lasted until the late 1930s. Now widely criticized as judicial overreach.

Case Information

Court: Supreme Court of Virginia
Court Level: State Supreme Court
Date Decided: Tuesday, January 6, 1959
Citation: No. 6163 (Va. Cir. Ct. 1959)
Jurisdiction: Virginia

Legal Topics

civil rightsfamily

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.