Kilbourn v. Thompson
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Kilbourn v. Thompson
Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168 (1880), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the question whether or not the United States House of Representatives may compel testimony .
Hallet Kilbourn was subpoenaed to testify before a Special Committee established by the House of Representatives to investigate the bankruptcy of Jay Cooke & Company . Though he appeared, he refused to answer any questions and did not tender requested documents. John G. Thompson, Sergeant-At-Arms for the House , took Kilbourn into custody. Kilbourn continued to refuse to testify and provided no explanation for his refusal. The House resolved that Kilbourn was in contempt and should be held in custody until he agreed to testify and produce the requested documents. The Court found that the House did not have the power to punish for contempt. However, House members could not be sued for false imprisonment as they were exercising their official duties and protected by the Speech and Debate Clause, Art. I, § 6, cl. 1. In addition the Supreme Court established several limits in the scope of investigations, called the "Kilbourn Test".
Contents
The Kilbourn Test
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kilbourn_v._Thompson&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: The Kilbourn Test")
- (1) Inquiries must not "invade areas constitutionally reserved to the courts or the executive"
- (2) Inquiries must deal "with subjects on which Congress could validly legislate"
- (3) The resolution authorizing the investigation must specify " a congressional interest in legislating on that subject."
- (4) Where the inquiry can result in "no valid legislation," then the "Private affairs of individuals" are not valid targets for inquiry
See also
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kilbourn_v._Thompson&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: See also")
_Calder v. Bull _, 3 U.S. 386 (1798)
_Ex parte Milligan _, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)
_United States v. Cruikshank _, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
Further reading
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kilbourn_v._Thompson&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: Further reading")
- McGeary, M. Nelson (1948). "The Congressional Power of Investigation". Nebraska Law Review. 28: 516. ISSN 0047-9209 .
- Morgan, Gerald D. (1949). "Congressional Investigations and Judicial Review: Kilbourn v. Thompson Revisited"
. California Law Review. 37 (4). California Law Review, Inc.: 556–574. doi
:10.2307/3477687
. JSTOR
3477687
.[_dead link
_]
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kilbourn_v._Thompson&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: External links")
Works related to Kilbourn v. Thompson at Wikisource
Text of Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168 (1880) is available from: Cornell Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist
The road to impeachment Archived September 23, 2006, at the Wayback Machine *
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kilbourn_v._Thompson&oldid=1351936247 "
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.