Kidd v. Pearson
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Kidd v. Pearson
Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U.S. 1 (1888), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a distinction between manufacturing and commerce meant that an Iowa law that prohibited the manufacture of alcohol (in this case for sale out-of-state) was constitutional as it did not conflict with the power of the US Congress to regulate interstate commerce .
Contents
Background
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kidd_v._Pearson&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Background")
In 1882, Iowa became a dry state with a passage of a state constitutional amendment. An Iowa state law supporting that prohibition made the manufacturing of liquor in Iowa illegal unless it was for mechanical, medicinal, culinary, and sacramental purposes. Nonetheless, the Polk County Board of Supervisors granted J. S. Kidd a license to operate a distillery in 1884 for other uses based on his intent to only sell the liquor outside the state of Iowa. When the state moved to close the distillery as a public nuisance , Kidd sued and argued it was outside of state jurisdiction as an exclusively interstate business under the Commerce Clause .
Question before the Supreme Court
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kidd_v._Pearson&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Question before the Supreme Court")
Is there a conflict between the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.
Decision of the Court
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kidd_v._Pearson&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: Decision of the Court")
The court ruled that there was not a conflict between Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce and the state law covering manufacturing within a given state. Therefore, the law was valid.
See also
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kidd_v._Pearson&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: See also")
_Varnum v. Brien _, 763 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009), another U.S. Supreme Court case from Polk County
References
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kidd_v._Pearson&action=edit§ion=5 "Edit section: References")
Further reading
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kidd_v._Pearson&action=edit§ion=6 "Edit section: Further reading")
- Fedora, H. Appleton (1940). "The Commerce Clause, the State's Police Power and Intoxicating Liquors". Kentucky Law Journal. 29: 66.
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kidd_v._Pearson&action=edit§ion=7 "Edit section: External links")
- Works related to Kidd v. Pearson at Wikisource
- Text of Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U.S. 1 (1888) is available from: Findlaw Justia Library of Congress
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kidd_v._Pearson&oldid=1332990121 "
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.