Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
This article **relies excessively on references
to primary sources
**. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources
.
Find sources: "Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission"
– news
· newspapers
· books
· scholar
· JSTOR (November 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message
)
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, 432 U.S. 333 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously struck down a North Carolina law prohibiting the sale of apples in closed containers marked with any apple grade other than the United States Department of Agriculture grade. However, displaying the USDA grade was not required. Washington state , a major apple producer, used apple standards superior to those used by the USDA. The Court found that North Carolina's law violated the Commerce Clause because they discriminated against Washington state apple producers while working to the advantage of local North Carolina apple growers.
John R. Jordan, Jr., argued the cause for Hunt. With him on the brief were Rufus L. Edmisten , Attorney General of North Carolina , and Millard R. Rich, Jr., Deputy Attorney General. Slade Gorton , Attorney General of Washington , argued the cause for the Washington State Apple Advertising Commission. With him on the brief were Edward B. Mackie, Deputy Attorney General, and James Arneil, Special Assistant Attorney General.
The Supreme Court decision established the concept of association standing, which allows for an association (in this case, the Commission) that represents one or more parties that have demonstrable injury to bring the case to trial with standing under Article III .
See also
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: See also")
References
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: References")
- ↑ "Supreme Court's Thomas questions ability of groups to challenge US laws | Reuters" . Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2026.
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: External links")
- **^ **Text of Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, 432 U.S. 333 (1977) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission&oldid=1351942805 "
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.