Hague v. CIO
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Hague v. CIO )
1939 United States Supreme Court case
Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496 (1939), is a US labor law case decided by the United States Supreme Court .
Facts
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hague_v._Committee_for_Industrial_Organization&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Facts")
]
In Jersey City , New Jersey , Mayor Frank Hague had in 1937 used a city ordinance to prevent labor meetings in public places and stop the distribution of literature pertaining to the Committee for Industrial Organization 's cause. He referred to the CIO as "communist ."
Judgment
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hague_v._Committee_for_Industrial_Organization&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Judgment")
]
District and circuit courts ruled in favor of the CIO, which brought the suit against the mayor for these actions and which was represented by Morris L. Ernst , Spaulding Frazer , Lee Pressman and Benjamin Kaplan . Hague appealed to the Supreme Court which ruled against him and held that Hague's ban on political meetings violated the First Amendment right to freedom of assembly , and so the ordinances were void.
This case brought forth the public forum to the Supreme Court, and is used as a tool for many other cases dealing with First Amendment Rights/ public forum issues. It took a long time after the 14th Amendment was adopted (1866) and ratified (1868) before the Supreme Court began to use it to assert individual rights against State and local Governments; which amplified the right to peacefully assemble and fight for freedom of speech.
Justice Roberts wrote in a concurring opinion that “[w]herever the title of streets and parks may rest, they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions. Such use of the streets and public places has, from ancient times, been a part of the privileges, immunities, rights, and liberties of citizens.”
See also
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hague_v._Committee_for_Industrial_Organization&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: See also")
]
Notes
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hague_v._Committee_for_Industrial_Organization&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: Notes")
]
External links
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hague_v._Committee_for_Industrial_Organization&action=edit§ion=5 "Edit section: External links")
]
Works related to Hague v. CIO at Wikisource
Text of Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496 (1939) is available from: Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress
U.S. Supreme Court Freedom of Speech Clause case law
**First Amendment to the United States Constitution **
- _Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project _ (2010)
- _Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar _ (2015)
Overbreadth
and
Vagueness doctrines
- _Terminiello v. City of Chicago _ (1949)
- _Smith v. Goguen _ (1974)
- _Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus _ (1987)
- _Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky _ (2018)
versus conduct
- _Stromberg v. California _ (1931)
- _United States v. O'Brien _ (1968)
- _Cohen v. California _ (1971)
- _Spence v. Washington _ (1974)
- _Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence _ (1984)
- _Dallas v. Stanglin _ (1989)
- _Texas v. Johnson _ (1989)
- _United States v. Eichman _ (1990)
- _Barnes v. Glen Theatre _ (1991)
- _City of Erie v. Pap's A. M. _ (2000)
- _Virginia v. Black _ (2003)
Content-based
restrictions
- _Lamont v. Postmaster General _ (1965)
- _Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego _ (1981)
- _Boos v. Barry _ (1988)
- _Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board _ (1991)
- _R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul _ (1992)
- _Reed v. Town of Gilbert _ (2015)
- _Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants _ (2020)
- _City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC _ (2022)
Content-neutral
restrictions
- _Schneider v. New Jersey _ (1939)
- _United States v. Albertini _ (1985)
- _Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. _ (1986)
- _Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc. _ (1986)
- _City of Ladue v. Gilleo _ (1994)
- _Packingham v. North Carolina _ (2017)
- _TikTok v. Garland _ (2025)
- _Minersville School District v. Gobitis _ (1940)
- _West Virginia State Board of Ed. v. Barnette _ (1943)
- _[Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo](https://en.wikipedia.org/wi
…
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.