Gunn v. Minton
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2013 United States Supreme Court case
Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251 (2013), is a US patent law case. The case dealt with the question of jurisdiction of patent law litigation in regard to attorney malpractice .
In a unanimous ruling, the United States Supreme Court decided that federal laws granting exclusive jurisdiction to cases involving patents does not preclude the ability of state courts to hear cases related to but not involving patents. The case was remanded to the Texas state courts for further proceedings.
References
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gunn_v._Minton&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: References")
]
- Jump up to: 1 2 Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251 (2013). This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document .
- ↑ "Jerry W. Gunn, et al., v. Vernon F. Minton - LII Supreme Court Bulletin - LII / Legal Information Institute" . Retrieved August 1, 2014.
- ↑ "Gunn v. Minton will impact future patent malpractice cases - Lexology" . January 14, 2013. Retrieved August 1, 2014.
External links
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gunn_v._Minton&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: External links")
]
- Text of Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251 (2013) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Oyez (oral argument audio)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gunn_v._Minton&oldid=1351333798 "
Hidden categories:
Search
Search
Gunn v. Minton
Add languages Add topic
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.