Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
This article includes a list of references , related reading , or external links , **but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations **. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (October 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message )
Guaranty Trust Co. v. York, 326 U.S. 99 (1945), was a United States Supreme Court case that described how federal courts were to follow state law. Justice Frankfurter delivered the majority opinion further refining the Erie Doctrine set forth in _Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins _.
Background
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guaranty_Trust_Co._v._York&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Background")
The Erie Doctrine, adopted in 1938, held that while Federal law was determinative in procedural matters, state law should control for substantive matters, thus preventing 'forum shopping' between state and Federal courts. The defendant in Guaranty Trust argued that the plaintiff's action was time-barred under a New York statute of limitations . The plaintiff countered that the relevant statute of limitations was "procedural," was not "substantive" law, and therefore was not within the ambit of the doctrine established in the Erie case.
Decision of the Court
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guaranty_Trust_Co._v._York&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Decision of the Court")
The Court dispensed with this substantive/procedural distinction and stated that regardless of whether the case was argued in state or federal court, the outcome should be substantially the same. Thus, the Court set forth an "outcome determinative test" for deciding whether a piece of state law must be obeyed in federal courts—if the outcome is substantively the same then the federal court can apply its own rules instead of state rules. The Court held in this case that the New York Statute of limitations be obeyed and the case was reversed and remanded.
This rule was refined first in _Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. _ and subsequently defined more specifically in a related series of cases over the next few decades.
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guaranty_Trust_Co._v._York&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: External links")
- Works related to Guaranty Trust Company v. York at Wikisource
- Text of Guaranty Trust Co. v. York, 326 U.S. 99 (1945) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guaranty_Trust_Co._v._York&oldid=1351968575 "
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.