Skip to main content
SCOTUS Case

Gonzaga University v. Doe

Primary source

Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.

Background

Gonzaga University v. Doe

Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 , which prohibits the federal government from funding educational institutions that release education records to unauthorized persons, does not create a right which is enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .

Learn more

This article **needs more citations **. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources . Unsourced material may be challenged and removed .
Find sources: "Gonzaga University v. Doe"  – news  · newspapers  · books  · scholar  · JSTOR (November 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message )

Contents

Background

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gonzaga_University_v._Doe&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")

A Gonzaga University undergraduate sued the school and teacher Roberta League under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a violation of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 . The student was planning to become an elementary teacher upon graduation, and under Washington State Law, all new teachers required an affidavit of good moral character from their graduating college. The teacher in charge of certifying such affidavits, League, overheard a student conversation discussing sexual misconduct by the undergraduate student. Subsequently, League launched an investigation into the matter, and refused to certify the student's necessary affidavit of good moral character. The student sued, claiming a violation of his confidentiality rights.

Decision

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gonzaga_University_v._Doe&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Decision")

In a 7–2 decision for Gonzaga University, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote the majority opinion for the court. The Supreme Court held that Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act's nondisclosure provisions created no personal rights to enforce under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act prohibits "the federal funding of educational institutions that have a policy or practice of releasing education records to unauthorized persons". 536 U.S. at 276. The court reasoned that this does not grant any personal rights to enforce under the civil rights provisions of § 1983, since the statute only addresses federal funding.

See also

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gonzaga_University_v._Doe&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: See also")

References

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gonzaga_University_v._Doe&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: References")

  1. Jump up to: 1 2 Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002).
  2. "Gonzaga Univ. v. Doe - 536 U.S. 273 (2002)" . The Oyez Project. Retrieved October 16, 2013.

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gonzaga_University_v._Doe&action=edit&section=5 "Edit section: External links")

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gonzaga_University_v._Doe&oldid=1362869679 "

Read the full Wikipedia article

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.