Skip to main content
SCOTUS Case

FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.

Primary source

Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.

Background

FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.

FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., 568 U.S. 216 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that state-action immunity does not apply when the state has not clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed that its plan to enter the market will substantially lessen competition.

Background

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FTC_v._Phoebe_Putney_Health_System,_Inc.&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")

Under Georgia's Hospital Authorities Law (Law), political subdivisions may create special-purpose public entities called "hospital authorities" to provide "for the operation and maintenance of needed health care facilities in the several counties and municipalities of th[e] state." The Law permits authorities to "exercise public and essential governmental functions" and delegates to them numerous general powers, including the ability to acquire and lease hospitals and other public health facilities.

The Hospital Authority of AlbanyDougherty County (Authority) owns Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital (Memorial), one of two hospitals in the county. The Authority formed two private nonprofit corporations to manage Memorial: Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. (PPHS) and Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. (PPMH). After the Authority decided to purchase the second hospital in the county and lease it to a subsidiary of PPHS, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an administrative complaint alleging that the transaction would substantially reduce competition in the market for acute-care hospital services, in violation of §5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and §7 of the Clayton Act . The FTC and Georgia subsequently sued the Authority, PPHS, PPMH, and others (collectively defendants), seeking to enjoin the transaction pending administrative proceedings.

The federal District Court denied the request for a preliminary injunction and granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, holding that the defendants were immune from antitrust liability under the state action doctrine. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. It concluded that the Authority, as a local governmental entity, was entitled to state-action immunity because the challenged anticompetitive conduct was a foreseeable result of the Law. The court reasoned that the state legislature could have readily anticipated an anticompetitive effect, given the breadth of the powers delegated to hospital authorities, particularly leasing and acquisition powers that could lead to consolidation of hospital ownership.

Opinion of the court

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FTC_v._Phoebe_Putney_Health_System,_Inc.&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the court")

Learn more

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding missing information . (September 2025)

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on February 19, 2013.

Subsequent developments

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FTC_v._Phoebe_Putney_Health_System,_Inc.&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: Subsequent developments")

Learn more

This section is empty. You can help by adding to it . (September 2025)

References

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FTC_v._Phoebe_Putney_Health_System,_Inc.&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: References")

  1. Jump up to: 1 2 3 4 5 FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., 568 U.S. 216 (2013).
  2. Denniston, Lyle (February 19, 2013). "Opinion recap: A warning about competition" . SCOTUSblog. Retrieved September 28, 2025.

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FTC_v._Phoebe_Putney_Health_System,_Inc.&action=edit&section=5 "Edit section: External links")

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court . As a work of the U.S. federal government , the text is in the **public domain **.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FTC_v._Phoebe_Putney_Health_System,_Inc.&oldid=1351976626 "

Read the full Wikipedia article

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.