Skip to main content
SCOTUS Case

Frank v. Maryland

Primary source

Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.

Background

Frank v. Maryland

Frank v. Maryland, 359 U.S. 360 (1959), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution .

Frank refused to allow the health inspectors into his home citing the Fourth Amendment. Inspectors were trying to perform an administrative search for code violations, specifically a rat infestation, not a criminal investigation, so they did not believe they were violating the Fourth Amendment. The Court, in an opinion written by Felix Frankfurter , decided in favor of the inspectors claiming that the search would benefit the public more than Frank's interests in privacy.

The Supreme Court would reverse this decision eight years later in _Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco _, 387 U.S. 523 (1967), ruling that the City of San Francisco could not prosecute a person for refusing to consent to a search of their home by a city inspector, and the inspector may only search either by having consent, or must have a search warrant issued based on probable cause of a violation of law.

See also

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_v._Maryland&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: See also")

References

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_v._Maryland&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: References")

  1. Frank v. Maryland, 359 U.S. 360 (1959).
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1967).

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_v._Maryland&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: External links")

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_v._Maryland&oldid=1351927015 "

Read the full Wikipedia article

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.