Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2008 United States Supreme Court case
Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, 553 U.S. 328 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a Kentucky law that provides a preferential tax break to Kentucky residents who invest in bonds issued by the state and its municipalities (municipal bonds ). The Court held in a 7–2 vote that the State of Kentucky does not engage in unconstitutional discrimination against interstate commerce by exempting the interest on its bonds from residents' taxable income while taxing the interest earned on the bonds of other states. The case has national implications because thirty-six (36) states have tax schemes similar to the one at issue in Kentucky.
Background
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Revenue_of_Kentucky_v._Davis&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Background")
]
George and Catherine Davis sued the State of Kentucky under the legal theory that the State of Kentucky violated the Dormant Commerce Clause , a legal implication of the Commerce Clause , by providing a differential tax treatment to gains earned from investments in municipal bonds from Kentucky versus other states.
Opinion of the Court
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Revenue_of_Kentucky_v._Davis&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")
]
The majority opinion stated that the Kentucky tax scheme benefited a clearly public issuer, while treating all private issuers exactly the same. There was no forbidden discrimination because Kentucky, as a public entity, did not have to treat itself as being "substantially similar" to the other bond issuers in the market. The Kentucky tax scheme was constitutional because the Commonwealth's direct participation favored, not local private entrepreneurs, but the Commonwealth and local governments.
Footnotes
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Revenue_of_Kentucky_v._Davis&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: Footnotes")
]
- ↑ Greenhouse, Linda (May 20, 2008). "Court Upholds Tax Exemptions for Municipal Bonds" . New York Times. Retrieved May 20, 2008.
- ↑ Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis 553 U.S. ____, pg 5.
- ↑ Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis 553 U.S. ____, pg 6.
External links
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Revenue_of_Kentucky_v._Davis&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: External links")
]
- Text of Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, 553 U.S. 328 (2008) is available from: Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
U.S. Supreme Court Article I case law
Commerce Clause of Section VIII
Coinage Clause of Section VIII
Copyright Clause of Section VIII
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Revenue_of_Kentucky_v._Davis&oldid=1361588923 "
Hidden categories:
Search
Search
Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis
Add languages Add topic
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.