Concepcion v. United States
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2022 United States Supreme Court case
Concepcion v. United States, 597 U.S. 481 (2022), is a United States Supreme Court decision that concerns district courts' ability to consider changes of law or fact in exercising their discretion to reduce a sentence.
Background
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concepcion_v._United_States&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Background")
]
In 2006, Carlos Concepcion was arrested on felony drug charges for an illegal sale of cocaine . He pleaded guilty to the distribution of five grams of crack cocaine in 2008.
His penalty carried a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison but with his previous criminal conviction, the mandatory minimum sentence was elevated to ten years. Ultimately, he was subsequently sentenced to 19 years' imprisonment.
In 2010, Congress passed the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 , which increased the minimum threshold for the mandatory minimum sentence to be triggered to twenty-eight grams of crack cocaine. But because the Fair Sentencing Act didn't apply retroactively, his sentence remained the same. However, in 2018, Congress passed the First Step Act , which allowed for the Fair Sentencing Act's sentence reduction to apply retroactively and granted discretion to district courts to "impose or withhold" reducing a sentence. Subsequently, Concepcion filed a motion for sentence reduction due to Section 404(b) of the First Step Act . He also argued that the district court should no longer consider him a career offender under the 2018 Federal Sentencing Guidelines, since one of his convictions was previously vacated. The district court denied Concepcion's motion.
Concepcion appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit . The First Circuit affirmed, stating that Section 404(b) does not grant a new proceeding and that resentencing is "discretionary." He subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari.
Supreme Court
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concepcion_v._United_States&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Supreme Court")
]
The court granted certiorari on September 30, 2021, and heard oral arguments on January 19, 2022. On June 27, 2022, the Supreme Court reversed the First Circuit's ruling in a 5–4 vote and held that the "First Step Act allows district courts to consider intervening changes of law or fact in exercising their discretion to reduce a sentence." Justice Sotomayor wrote the majority opinion, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored the dissent.
References
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concepcion_v._United_States&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: References")
]
- Jump up to: 1 2 "Concepcion v. United States" (PDF). United States Supreme Court. June 27, 2022. Retrieved June 28, 2022.
- Jump up to: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Oliver, Theresa; Zarkower, Sam; Bialer, Daniel (January 13, 2022). "Concepcion v. United States" . LII / Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrieved June 28, 2022.
- Jump up to: 1 2 Poggio, Marco (September 30, 2021). "Supreme Court Will Seek To Solve Crack Resentencing Puzzle – Law360" . Law360. LexisNexis. Retrieved June 28, 2022.
External links
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concepcion_v._United_States&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: External links")
]
- Text of Concepcion v. United States, 597 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concepcion_v._United_States&oldid=1351978702 "
Hidden categories:
Search
Search
Concepcion v. United States
Add languages Add topic
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.