Skip to main content
SCOTUS Case

Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.

Primary source

Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.

Background

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article has multiple issues. Please help **improve it ** or discuss these issues on the **talk page **. (Learn how and when to remove these messages )

(Learn how and when to remove this message )

1985 United States Supreme Court case

Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc., 472 U.S. 491 (1985), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that though portions of a law against obscenity and prostitution might be invalid, it would not be invalidated as a whole unless severing unconstitutional provisions would result in an unworkable law.

Background

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brockett_v._Spokane_Arcades,_Inc.&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")
]

The case involved a state statute that punished the publication of obscene materials. Obscene or lewd materials were defined by the law to include all materials that appeal to the prurient interest, among other things. "Prurient" was defined as material that incites lasciviousness or lust. The law was challenged as overbroad under the First Amendment because material that arouses only a "normal, healthy interest in sex" is constitutionally protected, but was banned by the law.

Opinion of the Court

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brockett_v._Spokane_Arcades,_Inc.&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")
]

The Court agreed with lower court rulings that the law was overbroad, however found that the entire statute could not be stricken. The code contained a severability provision indicating that the law should not be completely invalidated unless the one unconstitutional provision could not be stricken without making the law unworkable. The Court remanded the case to allow the lower court to decide if the objectionable provision could be stricken and the remainder of the law upheld.

See also

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brockett_v._Spokane_Arcades,_Inc.&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: See also")
]

References

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brockett_v._Spokane_Arcades,_Inc.&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: References")
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brockett_v._Spokane_Arcades,_Inc.&oldid=1361642403 "

Categories :

Hidden categories:

Search

Search

Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.

Add languages Add topic

Read the full Wikipedia article

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.