Board of Education, Island Trees School District v. Pico
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Island Trees School District v. Pico
(Redirected from Board of Education, Island Trees School District v. Pico )
Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982), is a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court split on the First Amendment issue of local school boards removing library books from junior high schools and high schools . Four justices ruled that it was unconstitutional, four concluded the contrary (with perhaps a few minor exceptions), and one concluded that the court need not decide the question on the merits. Pico was the first Supreme Court case to consider the right to receive information in a library setting under the First Amendment, but the court's fractured plurality decision left the scope of this right unclear.
Island Trees High School in 2019
Contents
Facts
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Island_Trees_School_District_v._Pico&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Facts")
Background
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Island_Trees_School_District_v._Pico&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Background")
In September 1975, the Island Trees Board of Education received a list of books deemed inappropriate by Parents of New York United. The board temporarily removed the books from school libraries and formed a committee to review the list. The committee found that five of the nine books should be returned, but the board overruled the decision and returned only two of the books.
A group of five high school students (including one junior high school student) who, according to oral argument, were 17, 16, 15, 14, and 13 years old at the time of the removal of the books, led by Steven Pico, filed a lawsuit against the school board by claiming a violation of First Amendment rights. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of the school board, citing the discretion given to a school board's authority in terms of its political philosophy. The judgment was challenged and remanded by the Second Circuit after questions rose of the school board's motives.
Case
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Island_Trees_School_District_v._Pico&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: Case")
According to the syllabus of the case:
Petitioner Board of Education of the Island Trees Union Free School District , rejecting recommendations of a committee of parents and school staff that it had appointed, ordered that certain books, which the Board characterized as "anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Sem[i]tic, and just plain filthy," be removed from high school and junior high school libraries. Respondent students then brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Board and petitioner Board members, alleging that the Board's actions had denied respondents their rights under the First Amendment. The District Court granted summary judgment in petitioners' favor. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a trial on the merits of respondents' allegations.
Eleven books were the subject of the case. The books were:
_The Naked Ape _, by Desmond Morris
_Best Short Stories of Negro Writers _, edited by Langston Hughes
_Go Ask Alice _, of anonymous authorship
_Laughing Boy _, by Oliver LaFarge
_Black Boy _, by Richard Wright
_Soul on Ice _, by Eldridge Cleaver
_A Reader for Writers _, edited by Jerome Archer
_The Fixer _, by Bernard Malamud
The first nine titles above were removed from shelves of the High School library; A Reader for Writers was removed from the Junior High School library because it contained the 1729 satirical essay _A Modest Proposal _ by Jonathan Swift which the Board found to be offensive; and The Fixer was removed from the curriculum of a 12th-grade literature course.
Plurality
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Island_Trees_School_District_v._Pico&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: Plurality")
No single opinion commanded a majority of the Court or announced any legal binding rule. Justice Brennan announced the judgment of the Court affirming the Court of Appeals and delivered an opinion joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens and joined in all
…
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened in Board of Education V Pico?+
In the Supreme Court case Island Trees School District v. Pico (1982), the Court held that the First Amendment limits the power of junior high and high school officials to remove books from school libraries because of their content.
Sourced from Island Trees School District v. Pico, 1982 Supreme Court case ...
Why did the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education 1954 fail to result in the quick desegregation of schools?+
Recognizing the controversial nature of its decision, the Court waited another year to issue an order enforcing the decision in Brown II. Even then, the Court was unwilling to establish a firm timetable for dismantling segregation. It ruled only that public schools desegregate “with all deliberate speed.”
Sourced from Brown v. Board of Education | The Case that Changed America
What Supreme Court case addressed whether a school board could remove books from a public school library because of disagreement with their content?+
In Board of Education v. Pico, the United States Supreme Court addressed the authority of school boards to remove books from library shelves. The case originated from the Island Trees Union Free School District in New York. The school board removed several books from the library that it deemed inappropriate.
Sourced from BOARD OF EDUCATION v. PICO, 457 U.S. 853 (1982) - FindLaw Caselaw
Related searches
- Island Trees School District v Pico summary
- Island trees school district v pico who won
- Steven Pico
- Board of education island trees union free school district no 26 v pico by pico
- Bethel School District v Fraser
- Island trees v pico decision
- Board of education v pico pdf
- Hazelwood school District v Kuhlmeier
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.