Skip to main content
Back to Cases

ATP v. State

2011 MT 328 (2011)

Federal & State Law Editorial TeamLast reviewed: August 2026

Opinion Summary

Upheld Montana's century-old Corrupt Practices Act limiting corporate campaign spending, directly conflicting with the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. The Montana court found the state's unique history of copper king corruption justified the law. Reversed per curiam by the U.S. Supreme Court in American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock.

About this case

Look for Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance on one of Wikipedia's sister projects :

[Wiktionary](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wiktionary:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
 (dictionary)
[Wikibooks](https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikibooks:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
 (textbooks)
[Wikiquote](https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikiquote:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
 (quotations)
[Wikisource](https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikisource:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
 (library)
[Wikiversity](https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikiversity:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
 (learning resources)
[Commons](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "commons:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
 (media)
[Wikivoyage](https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikivoyage:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
 (travel guide)
[Wikidata](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikidata:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
 (linked database)
[Wikispecies](https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikispecies:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
 (species directory)

Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.


Other reasons this message may be displayed:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "

Search

Search

Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance

Add topic

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

Related Cases

Marbury v. Madison

5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)

Established the principle of judicial review, empowering federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Marshall held that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and when a statute conflicts with it, the courts must give effect to the Constitution. This foundational decision made the judiciary a coequal branch of government.

McCulloch v. Maryland

17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819)

Upheld the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States under the Necessary and Proper Clause and held that states cannot tax federal institutions. Chief Justice Marshall established a broad interpretation of congressional power, declaring that the federal government possesses implied powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution.

Dred Scott v. Sandford

60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)

Held that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens of the United States and had no standing to sue in federal court. Chief Justice Taney also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. Widely condemned as the worst Supreme Court decision in history, it inflamed sectional tensions and contributed to the onset of the Civil War. Effectively overruled by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Plessy v. Ferguson

163 U.S. 537 (1896)

Upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the 'separate but equal' doctrine. The Court ruled that Louisiana's law requiring separate railway cars for Black and white passengers did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Harlan's lone dissent declared the Constitution 'color-blind.' Overruled by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

Lochner v. New York

198 U.S. 45 (1905)

Struck down a New York law limiting bakery workers to a 60-hour work week, holding it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of liberty of contract. Inaugurated the 'Lochner era' of aggressive judicial review of economic regulations, which lasted until the late 1930s. Now widely criticized as judicial overreach.

Case Information

Court
Supreme Court of Montana
Court Level
State Supreme Court
Date Decided
Friday, December 30, 2011
Citation
2011 MT 328 (2011)
Jurisdiction
Montana

Legal Topics

electioncivil rights

People also ask on Google

Questions and answers below are surfaced by Google Search. Each answer is a short preview quoted from the source shown; follow the source link for the full context.

Are Supreme Court decisions binding on states?+

The decisions of the Supreme Court are binding on all federal courts, and are binding on state courts regarding issues of the Constitution and federal law. A case from a state's highest court may be appealed to the Supreme Court if there is a federal legal question involved.

Sourced from LibGuides: Case Law Research: U.S. Court System

Related searches

  • Are federal district court decisions binding on state courts
  • Pospisil et al v atp tour inc et al
  • Mandatory vs persuasive authority
  • Are district court decisions binding on themselves
  • Binding authority in law
  • Primary mandatory authority
  • ATP Flight School lawsuit false advertising
  • Binding v persuasive authority

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.