ATP v. State
2011 MT 328 (2011)
Opinion Summary
Upheld Montana's century-old Corrupt Practices Act limiting corporate campaign spending, directly conflicting with the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. The Montana court found the state's unique history of copper king corruption justified the law. Reversed per curiam by the U.S. Supreme Court in American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock.
About this case
Look for Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance on one of Wikipedia's sister projects :
[Wiktionary](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wiktionary:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
(dictionary)
[Wikibooks](https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikibooks:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
(textbooks)
[Wikiquote](https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikiquote:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
(quotations)
[Wikisource](https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikisource:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
(library)
[Wikiversity](https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikiversity:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
(learning resources)
[Commons](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "commons:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
(media)
[Wikivoyage](https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikivoyage:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
(travel guide)
[Wikidata](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikidata:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
(linked database)
[Wikispecies](https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "wikispecies:Special:Search/Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance")
(species directory)
Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.
- You need to log in or create an account and be autoconfirmed to create new articles. Alternatively, you can use the article wizard to submit a draft for review, or request a new article .
- Search for "Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance" in existing articles.
- Look for pages within Wikipedia that link to this title .
Other reasons this message may be displayed:
- If a page was recently created here, it may not be visible yet because of a delay in updating the database; wait a few minutes or try the purge function .
- Titles on Wikipedia are **case sensitive ** except for the first character; please check alternative capitalizations and consider adding a redirect here to the correct title.
- If the page has been deleted, check the deletion log , and see Why was the page I created deleted?
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atp_v._State_Montana_Campaign_Finance "
Search
Search
Atp v. State Montana Campaign Finance
Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).
Related Cases
Marbury v. Madison
5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
Established the principle of judicial review, empowering federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Marshall held that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and when a statute conflicts with it, the courts must give effect to the Constitution. This foundational decision made the judiciary a coequal branch of government.
McCulloch v. Maryland
17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819)
Upheld the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States under the Necessary and Proper Clause and held that states cannot tax federal institutions. Chief Justice Marshall established a broad interpretation of congressional power, declaring that the federal government possesses implied powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution.
Dred Scott v. Sandford
60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)
Held that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens of the United States and had no standing to sue in federal court. Chief Justice Taney also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. Widely condemned as the worst Supreme Court decision in history, it inflamed sectional tensions and contributed to the onset of the Civil War. Effectively overruled by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Plessy v. Ferguson
163 U.S. 537 (1896)
Upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the 'separate but equal' doctrine. The Court ruled that Louisiana's law requiring separate railway cars for Black and white passengers did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Harlan's lone dissent declared the Constitution 'color-blind.' Overruled by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.
Lochner v. New York
198 U.S. 45 (1905)
Struck down a New York law limiting bakery workers to a 60-hour work week, holding it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of liberty of contract. Inaugurated the 'Lochner era' of aggressive judicial review of economic regulations, which lasted until the late 1930s. Now widely criticized as judicial overreach.
Case Information
- Court
- Supreme Court of Montana
- Court Level
- State Supreme Court
- Date Decided
- Friday, December 30, 2011
- Citation
- 2011 MT 328 (2011)
- Jurisdiction
- Montana
Legal Topics
People also ask on Google
Questions and answers below are surfaced by Google Search. Each answer is a short preview quoted from the source shown; follow the source link for the full context.
Are Supreme Court decisions binding on states?+
The decisions of the Supreme Court are binding on all federal courts, and are binding on state courts regarding issues of the Constitution and federal law. A case from a state's highest court may be appealed to the Supreme Court if there is a federal legal question involved.
Sourced from LibGuides: Case Law Research: U.S. Court System
Related searches
- Are federal district court decisions binding on state courts
- Pospisil et al v atp tour inc et al
- Mandatory vs persuasive authority
- Are district court decisions binding on themselves
- Binding authority in law
- Primary mandatory authority
- ATP Flight School lawsuit false advertising
- Binding v persuasive authority
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.