Arkansas v. Sanders
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Arkansas v. Sanders
Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that, absent exigency , the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police, is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception. Similar to _United States v. Chadwick _ (1977), the luggage was the subject of police suspicion before being placed in the vehicle.
Sanders resolved two distinct lines of cases: on the one hand, _Carroll v. United States _ (1925) laid down the automobile exception which allowed for warrantless searches of automobiles; on the other hand, Chadwick did not allow for a warrantless search of luggage. Sanders declined to extend the automobile exception here, again stressing, as in Chadwick, the heightened expectation of privacy in one's luggage.
See also
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arkansas_v._Sanders&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: See also")
_United States v. Ross _, 456 U.S. 798 (1982)
_California v. Greenwood _, 486 U.S. 35 (1988)
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arkansas_v._Sanders&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: External links")
- Text of Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979) is available from: Findlaw Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arkansas_v._Sanders&oldid=1351340130 "
Frequently Asked Questions
Related searches
- United States v Ross
- Ca v acevedo
- U.S. v Chadwick
- United States v Chadwick case brief
- Acevedo v us
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.