Altvater v. Freeman
Primary source
Background below is sourced from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). We link back to the source for attribution; edits made by Wikipedia editors after our last scrape may not appear here.
Background
Altvater v. Freeman
Altvater v. Freeman, 319 U.S. 359 (1943), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that, although a licensee had maintained payments of royalties, a Declaratory Judgment Act claim of invalidity of the licensed patent still presented a justiciable case or controversy.
See also
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Altvater_v._Freeman&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: See also")
_MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. _, 549 U.S. 118 (2007)
Further reading
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Altvater_v._Freeman&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Further reading")
- Maines, Ruanne Neighbour (1949). "Declaratory Judgments: Patent Litigation: Justiciable Controversy". California Law Review. 37 (3). California Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 3: 506–510. doi :10.2307/3477809 . JSTOR 3477809 .
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Altvater_v._Freeman&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: External links")
- Works related to Altvater v. Freeman at Wikisource
- Text of Altvater v. Freeman, 319 U.S. 359 (1943) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Altvater_v._Freeman&oldid=1351335583 "
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.