Zutz v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reputational damage and embarrassment are insufficient to chill a person of ordinary firmness from engaging in protected activity
• explaining that to state a § 1983 claira, “a plaintiff must allege sufficient facts to show (1) that the defendant(s
• stating that for purposes of a § 1983 claim, “a plaintiff must allege sufficient facts to show that the defendant(s) acted under color of state law”
• stating that for purposes of a § 1983 claim, “a plaintiff must allege sufficient facts to show that the defendant(s) acted under color of state law”
• noting that an amendment is considered futile when it “could not withstand a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
• noting that an amendment is considered futile when it “could not withstand a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).