Zurn v. Tetlow

Citations

• 134 Pa. 213
• 19 A. 504
• 1890 Pa. LEXIS 692

Syllabus

<p>In an action to recover for personal injuries charged to the defendant’s negligence, the plaintiff's evidence showing that, being over fourteen years of age, he was employed about a machine in the defendant’s cotton mill, not in itself dangerous when used with ordinary care, and that previous to his injury at the machine he had received such instructions as were necessary, there was nothing in the case to bring it within Rummel v. Dilworth, 131 Pa. 509, and it was not error to enter judgment of nonsuit.</p>