Zurich Reinsurance (UK) Ltd. v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant in a homicide case “was entitled and bound to take an interest in the life and safety of his brother,” and his use of a deadly weapon to that end was not necessarily evidence of malice
• the defendant in a homicide case “was entitled and bound to take an interest in the life and safety of his brother,” and his use of a deadly weapon to that end was not necessarily evidence of malice
• the defendant in a homicide case “was entitled and bound to take an interest in the life and safety of his brother,” and his use of a deadly weapon to that end was not necessarily evidence of malice
• the defendant in a homicide case “was entitled and bound to take an interest in the life and safety of his brother,” and his use of a deadly weapon to that end was not necessarily evidence of malice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).