Skip to main content
· 4/26/2010

Zurich American Insurance v. O'Hara

Citations

  • 604 F.3d 1232
  • 49 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1018
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8570
  • 2010 WL 1641369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that they cannot do so
  • “Applying federal common law to override the Plan’s controlling language, which expressly provides for reimbursement regardless of whether [insured] was made whole ... would frustrate, rather than effectuate ERISA’s ... purpose to protect contractually defined benefits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Birch, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.