· 4/26/2010
Zurich American Insurance v. O'Hara
Citations
- 604 F.3d 1232
- 49 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1018
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8570
- 2010 WL 1641369
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that they cannot do so
- “Applying federal common law to override the Plan’s controlling language, which expressly provides for reimbursement regardless of whether [insured] was made whole ... would frustrate, rather than effectuate ERISA’s ... purpose to protect contractually defined benefits”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dubina, Birch, Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.