Zurich American Insurance Co. v. McVey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that traveling away from ordinary job site to perform task at an employer-hosted conference that was not part of ordinary job duties supported origination element
• reasoning that traveling away from ordinary job site to perform task that was not part of ordinary job duties supported origination element
• reasoning that traveling away from ordinary job site to perform task that was not part of ordinary job duties supported origination element
• concluding in course and scope of employment when required to attend leadership training meeting, ordered to travel to Houston, provided vehicle and paid for expenses, different from regular safety meetings, and mandated manner of travel
• holding that employee who was killed while traveling in his company vehicle to an out-of- town worksite was in the course and scope of his employment and reasoning that he “was not traveling [out of town] by his own choice but was required to go there to do his job”
• Leordeanu held that “subparagraphs (A) and (B) are mutually exclusive and thus any travel between work and home, even if it is also for a dual purpose, must be analyzed exclusively under paragraph (A)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).