N.D. Illinois· 9/17/2001
Zurba v. United States
Citations
- 202 F.R.D. 590
- 50 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1042
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14861
- 2001 WL 1090267
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[I]t is only when the treating physician gives opinions beyond the scope of his own observation and treatment that he is considered a `retained' expert for purposes of [rule 26].\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Zurba v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.