Zumberge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Furthermore, because the appellant expressed difficulty hearing at various times throughout the trial, it is reasonable to infer that he was able to hear during the remainder of the proceedings.”
• among the commendable actions taken to pay more than “just ‘lip service’” to the appellant’s hearing impairment were the admonishments to the witnesses to sit close to the microphone and speak loudly into it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).