New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 3/23/1989
Zukerman v. Piper Pools, Inc.
Citations
- 556 A.2d 775
- 232 N.J. Super. 74
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[t]he purpose of the rule is not only to guard a minor against an improvident compromise but also to secure the minor against dissipation of the proceeds.”
- noting rule requiring judicial approval of infant settlements \is essentially designed to protect the best interests of the child\
- \removal must be for good cause ... of misconduct or inability to serve the best interests of the ward\
- \removal must be for good cause ... of misconduct or inability to serve the best interests of the ward\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Petrella, Shebell and Gruccio
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court· 1992-09-09· cited 381×
- HOJNOWSKI EX REL. HOJNOWSKI v. Vans Skate ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2006-07-17· cited 159×
- Riemer v. St. Clare's Riverside Medical CenterNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-04-24· cited 17×
- Zukerman Ex Rel. Zukerman v. Piper PoolsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-05-22· cited 15×
- Hojnowski v. Vans Skate ParkNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-03-10· cited 12×
- Scalza v. Shop Rite Supermarkets, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-10-27· cited 11×
- S.T. VS. 1515 BROAD STREET, LLC VS. VIRGINIA GLASS PRODUCTS (L-1651-10, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-08-06· cited 5×
- A.T., an Infant by Her Mother and Natural GuardianNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2016-04-27· cited 4×
- in Re George Green and Garlan GreenTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-01-12
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-07-06· cited 220×
- Pascarella v. BruckNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1983-06-14· cited 169×
- Honeywell v. BubbNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-09-30· cited 77×
- Hake v. Manchester TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-01-22· cited 67×
- Matter of YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-12-27· cited 57×
- ZON. BD. OF ADJ. OF TP. OF SPARTA v. Service Elec. Cable Television of NJ, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-01-25· cited 32×
- Bush v. New Jersey & New York Transit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1959-06-30· cited 31×
- Stout v. StoutNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-12-16· cited 27×
- Grant v. WrightNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-01-22· cited 24×
- Colfer v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-12-19· cited 18×
- Bauer v. GriffinNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1969-02-14· cited 18×
- Bauer v. GriffinNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1970-02-02· cited 16×
- Pascarella v. BruckSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-09-07· cited 13×
- Carton v. BordenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1951-12-21· cited 12×
- Sutherland v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-01-08· cited 12×
- Sussex Mutual Insurance v. Hala Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-12-02· cited 11×
- MacK v. BerryNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-07-12· cited 9×
- Lee v. GuckerNew York Supreme Court· 1959-04-29· cited 9×
- In re the Estate of FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-03-19· cited 8×
- Hollaway v. Scripps Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-11-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.