Zuidema v. Pedicano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing sexual assault in the context of a medical negligence claim and finding “an incongruity in allowing a plaintiff to prove a negligence action based on a defendant's intentional conduct”
• \Our courts have recognized both the availability and unavailability of administrative regulations as evidence of a standard of care.\
• a medical malpractice claim must allege “the improper performance of a professional service that deviated from the acceptable standard of care”
• when the common knowledge exception applies, the standard of care need not be established by expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).