Skip to main content
· 11/19/1900

Zugsmith v. Rosenblatt & Co.

Citations

  • 15 Pa. Super. 296
  • 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 343

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Beview of discretion.</p> <p>The appellate court will not revise the exercise of the discretion of the court below where there is no manifest abuse thereof.</p> <p>Charge of court — Concise statement of respective contentions.</p> <p>A clear and concise statement in untechnical language by the trial judge, of the respective contentions of the parties, is of great aid to the jury and often absolutely essential, even though it be not accompanied by a review and an analysis of the evidence adduced in support of them.</p> <p>Appeal — Technical but trifling error not reversible.</p> <p>Where evidence admitted under objection is of such trifling importance that it could not have affected the result, the appellate court will not reverse even if there were technical error in the ruling.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.