· 2/28/1983
Zugel Ex Rel. Zugel v. Miller
Citations
- 659 P.2d 296
- 99 Nev. 100
- 1983 Nev. LEXIS 400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that appellate courts are not suited to address disputes that raise factual issues
- stating that the party who can personally serve notice or use registered or certified mail has the burden of proof as to notice
- stating, when addressing an untimely filing, that \[t]his court is not a fact-finding tribunal\ and \that function is best performed by the district court\
- \Filing a timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional and an untimely appeal may not be considered.\
- stating, when addressing an untimely filing, that \[t]his court is not a fact-finding tribunal\ and \that function is best performed by the district court\
- \Filing a timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional and an untimely appeal may not be considered.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.