Skip to main content
· 2/28/1983

Zugel Ex Rel. Zugel v. Miller

Citations

  • 659 P.2d 296
  • 99 Nev. 100
  • 1983 Nev. LEXIS 400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that appellate courts are not suited to address disputes that raise factual issues
  • stating that the party who can personally serve notice or use registered or certified mail has the burden of proof as to notice
  • stating, when addressing an untimely filing, that \[t]his court is not a fact-finding tribunal\ and \that function is best performed by the district court\
  • \Filing a timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional and an untimely appeal may not be considered.\
  • stating, when addressing an untimely filing, that \[t]his court is not a fact-finding tribunal\ and \that function is best performed by the district court\
  • \Filing a timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional and an untimely appeal may not be considered.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.