Zuckerman v. National Union Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that application of prejudice rule to “claims-made” policy would constitute “unbargained-for expansion of coverage, gratis”
• rejecting application of \appreciable prejudice\ doctrine to expand liability under claims-made policy
• rejecting application of “appreciable prejudice” doctrine to expand liability under claims-made policy
• for an excellent discussion of the discrete issues presented by claims and occurrence made policies
• where policy covered \claims first made against the insured and reported to the [Insurer] during the policy period\ insurer was not required to demonstrate prejudice to deny coverage based on notice given ten months after policy expired
• extension of notice period in claims-made policy creates unbargained-for expansion of coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).