Skip to main content
· 7/29/2011

Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP v. Auffenberg

Citations

  • 646 F.3d 919
  • 396 U.S. App. D.C. 195
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15661
  • 2011 WL 3211515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a defendant’s first available opportunity is “typically in filing his first responsive pleading or motion 'to dismiss”
  • suggesting that a defendant can “overcome the presumption of having forfeit his right to a stay” if “his conduct- in litigation after the first responsive pleading imposed no or little cost upon opposing counsel and the courts”
  • focusing on a party’s filings to determine whether he had waived the right to arbitrate
  • “By this opinion we alert the bar in this Circuit that failure to invoke arbitration at the first available opportunity will presumptively extinguish a client’s ability later to opt for arbitration.”
  • “A [party] who delays seeking a stay pending arbitration until after his first available opportunity might still prevail on a later stay motion provided his delay did not prejudice his opponent or the court.”
  • potential prejudice is among circumstances to be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Garland, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.